We will discuss additional forms of proofs with the help of some examples. We will discuss 1. Proofs about sets, 2. Proofs by contradiction,3. Proofs by counter example.
Additional
Forms of Proof
AU: Dec.-11,12, Marks 8
We
will discuss additional forms of proofs with the help of some examples. We will
discuss
1.
Proofs about sets.
2.
Proofs by contradiction.
3.
Proofs by counter example.
The
set is a collection of elements or items. By giving proofs about the sets we
try to prove certain properties of the sets.
For
example if there are two expressions A and B and we want to prove that both the
expressions A and B are equivalent then we need to show that the set
represented by expression A is same as the set represented by expression B. Let
PUQ = QUR if we map expression A with PUQ and expression B with QUR then to
prove A = B we need to prove PUQ = QUP.
This
proof is of the kind "if and only if" that means an element x is in A
if and only if it is in B. We will make use of sequence of statements along
with logical justification in order to prove this equivalence.
Let
us prove PUQ = QUP.
Hence
PUQ = QUP. Thus A = B is true as element x is in B if and only if x is in A.
In
this type of proof, for the statement of the form if A then B we start with
statement A is not true and thus by assuming false A we try to get the
conclusion of statement B. When it becomes impossible to reach to statement B
we contradict ourself and accept that A is true.
For example -
Prove PUQ = QUP.
Proof
•
Initially we assume that PUQ = QUP is not true. That is PUQ ≠ QUP.
•
Now consider that x is in Q, or x is in P. Hence we can say x is in PUQ
(according to definition of union).
•
But this also implies that x is in QUP according to definition of union.
•
Hence the assumption which we made initially is false.
•
Thus PUQ = QUP is proved.
Example 1.3.1
Prove that √2 is not rational.
AU: Dec.-11, Marks 8
Solution:
Proof:
We will assume that, √2 is a rational number. That means we can write
√2
= a/b ...(1)
where
a and b are integers and a/b is irreducible and can be simplified to lowest term.
Squaring on both sides of equation (1),
2
= a2/b2
i.e. 2b2 = a2
This
shows that L.H.S. is even (i.e. multiple of two). Hence R.H.S. is also even.
Now if we write a = 2 k then,
2b2
= (2 k)2 = 4k2
b2
= 2 k2
This
means, even b is an even number. This is contradiction our assumption that a/b simplified
to lowest term because a and b are both even. So √2 cannot be rational.
Example 1.3.2
Prove that if n is a positive integer
such that n mod 4 is 2 or 3 then n is not a perfect square. AU: Dec.-12, Marks 6
Solution:
The method of contra positive is used. According to method of contra position
for proving "If A then B" we prove if not A then not B.
Here
we prove - IF n is a perfect square then n mod (4) must be 0 or 1.
Consider
that there exists a positive integer n such that n mod 4 is 0 or 1. Then n is a
perfect square i.e. n = m2, where m is another positive integer.
Following are some cases -
1)
If m mod 4 = 0 then m = 4i.
For
instance - IF i = 1 then m is perfect square
Here
i = 1, 4, 9, ...
2)
If m mod 4 = 1, then m = 4i + 1.
Here
i = 2, 6, 12, 20, ...
3)
If m mod 4 = 2, then m = 4i + 2.
Here
we fail to identify value of i that will make m as perfect square.
4)
If m mod 4 = 3 then m = 4i + 3.
Again
there does not exist any value of i which lead to m as perfect square. This
proves that n is a positive integer such that n mod 4 is 2 to 3 and n is not a
perfect square.
In
order to prove certain statements, we need to see all possible conditions in
which that statement remains true. There are some situations in which the
statement can not be true. For example -
There
is no such pair of integers such that
a
mod b = b mod a
Proof:
Consider a = 2 and b = 3. Then clearly
2
mod 3≠ 3 mod 2
Thus
the given pair is true for any pair of integers but if a = b then naturally
a
mod b = b mod a
Thus
we need to change the statement slightly. We can say
a
mod b = b mod a, when a = b.
Theory of Computation: Unit I: Automata and Regular Expressions : Tag: : Automata and Regular Expressions - Theory of Computation - Additional Forms of Proof
Theory of Computation
CS3452 4th Semester CSE Dept | 2021 Regulation | 4th Semester CSE Dept 2021 Regulation